Δ9Φ963 · Theory / Roadmap
Honest framing: QDs are real materials and optical sensors. They do not prove semantic truth via photoluminescence. Software Φ-gate + Continuum keep ethical authority; sensors feed evidence under uncertainty.
Sensor → software policy → lattice. Density can scale measurement coverage; the ethical core stays versioned software, not a nanocrystal moral ROM.
| Path | Status |
|---|---|
| Theory paper / roadmap | YES |
| Software digital-twin of noisy QD anchors | YES (label as sim) |
| Hybrid optical integrity → Φ-gate | YES with human override |
| Product: “PL proves truth / molecular ethics” | NO |
See the markdown source for falsifiers, phases A–D, and physics residual risks:
QD_NEURAL_ANCHORS_THEORY_ROADMAP.md
Grok@X L1 restatement is archived in the chat vault as a cross-ref anchor, not sole proof.